Lower Part Costs – Greater Design Flexibility
The production of thick-walled parts or parts of varying wall
thickness often require very long cooling times and generally result in
a high scrap rate due to defects. With conventional injection molding
this is rarely cost-effective but the fluid injection process can
provide the solution. The idea is to force excess melt out of the
interior of the molding by means of a fluid and - and with that same
fluid - create the necessary holding pressure from within the part. The
practical advantages are obvious: part costs are reduced because less
material is required. Faster cycle times mean higher output which, together
with a lower scrap rate, can mean significant reductions in manufacturing costs.
In addition, the process offers increased design flexibility: irregular part geometries can now be produced economically.
Typically parts suited to this process include the furniture,
appliances and automotive industries. The fluid injection process can be
used to ensure even shrinkage. It is also used in the production of parts with functional hollow
geometries such as pipes.
The Process
After the mold cavity has been filled and holding pressure briefly
applied to ensure a high quality surface finish, the fluid is injected
directly into the liquid melt of the central core through special
injection valves. This fluid displaces melt into secondary cavities
which can be closed off (secondary cavity processing) or back into the
barrel chamber (reverse pressure melt process). This patented process
produces parts with remarkable surface quality (e.g. no surface
blemishes) and can even seal off the core area. Another advantage of
this process is that the displaced melt is ready to be used for the
next molding cycle. This reduces costs even more. The fluids used
in the process are gases — usually nitrogen (Airpress) — or liquid —
usually water (Aquapress). When water is used as the fluid an
additional step is added to the process: a vent opening allows air
pressure to displace the water resulting in an almost dry part.
Gas or Water?
While the gas injection process (Airpress) is well-established, the
water injection process (Aquapress) is still quite new. Currently our
development efforts are focused on injectors, molding materials,
pressurizing units and optimizing the process in general. The
advantages and risks involved in using various fluids are outlined
below:
Advantages of water over gas:
• Significantly shorter cooling time
• Smooth interior part surfaces
• Larger cross sections are feasible
• Thinner wall sections
• Less distortion thanks to more even cooling
• Evenly distributed wall thicknesses – even with thick parts
• Cost reduction and easy availability of water as a pressure medium
Risks associated with water over gas:
• Greater effort required to ensure safety
• Measures to avoid water-spray in cases of installation errors.
• Water has to be removed from the component parts.
• The involved process of removing of contaminated water may be required
• Larger injector openings are necessary.
• Not suitable for all parts
Thanks to our extensive experience with these technologies we can
advise you which are the right fluids, parts, mold configurations, and
processes for your application. We work together with manufacturers in
the development of numerous applications, including customized
mono-sandwiching solutions.
More for Everyone
Ferromatik Milacron offers an integrated Airpress control unit as an
option for all of our machines (MAXIMA, ELEKTRA and K-TEC). All
the functions of this unit can be accessed via the IQT. In
addition, an external pressure unit for the fluid injection process can
also be used with the standardized interface.
